home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: news.iadfw.net!usenet
- From: Larry Weiss <lfw@iadfw.net>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: off-topic subject: Leap Years
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 1996 10:13:18 -0600
- Organization: ...
- Message-ID: <3131DC1E.464F@iadfw.net>
- References: <824158191snz@genesis.demon.co.uk> <fcusack-1302960025280001@mudskipper.cac.psu.edu> <4go5h2$sql@s02.pavilion.co.uk> <4gsknmINN7ff@duncan.cs.utk.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: dal19-29.ppp.iadfw.net
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Win16; I)
-
- Ron Charlton wrote:
- >
- > We are now making the same mistake when we "simplify" the leap year
- > calculation. Why not just do it correctly now? If the rules change
- > then at least future programmers won't be damning us for our laziness.
-
-
- Great point! There also seems to be a tacit assumption that all logic in all
- programs revolve around the present date. That's a poor assumption in
- general. And now back to "C"...
-